Jay Clarke vs Masamichi Imamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

J. Clarke vs M. Imamura

Jay Clarke
Jay Clarke

Flag GBR GBR

w
l
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
Masamichi Imamura
Masamichi Imamura

Flag JPN JPN

w
l
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
l

1

Win

2

Played

1

Win

27
Age
27
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
200
C. Rank
544
153
Best Rank
331
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$217.1K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Clarke 1 - 1 Imamura

They have played 4 sets in total, with Jay Clarke winning 2 and Masamichi Imamura winning 2. The last match between Masamichi Imamura and Jay Clarke was at the Pune Challenger, 18-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Masamichi Imamura getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-2.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Clarke1
Imamura1
Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R1Pune Challenger(02-18-25)

Hard
JPN Flag
Masamichi Imamura
7
6
GBR Flag
Jay Clarke
6
2

(R1New Delhi Challenger(02-11-25)

Hard
GBR Flag
Jay Clarke
6
6
JPN Flag
Masamichi Imamura
1
4

J. Clarke vs M. Imamura H2H Profile

Stats
$217,115Career Prize Money$0
58.88% (358-250)Career Total W/L57.19% (167-125)
1Hard1
16Titles1
1Total H2H Matches1
0.00% (0-1)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

J. Clarke vs M. Imamura Match Preview:

  1. Recent Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, both Clarke and Imamura have showcased commendable second serve performance. Clarke has triumphed in 49.96% of points on their second serve, while Imamura has accomplished a slight edge, winning 53.68%. This statistic holds a significant correlation with accurately predicting the outcome of matches.
  2. Return Game Statistics: Scrutinizing their recent form, Clarke emerges as the victor in terms of winning their opponent's second serve points, securing an impressive 55.53%. Imamura, on the other hand, has maintained a solid performance, winning 50.87%. The statistics for first serve returns are also noteworthy: Clarke claims a 35.92% success rate, while Imamura stands at 32.18%. These figures strongly influence determining the favorite in their head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
  3. Analysis Under Pressure: When faced with breakpoints, Clarke has shown resilience, successfully saving an impressive 59.5%. Similarly, Imamura's ability to ward off pressure is commendable, with a save rate of 61.81%. Such statistics prove invaluable for those engaged in in-game betting predictions.
  4. Performance Overview: Assessing their performance over the past year, Clarke has triumphed in 63.75% of matches played, boasting an impressive win/loss ratio of 51/29. Imamura, not to be outdone, has achieved a marginally higher success rate of 64.37%, with a win/loss record of 56/31. These numbers present a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head prediction.
  5. Surface Specialization: When it comes to surface specialization, Clarke shines on clay courts, winning 66% of matches (146/74). Conversely, their efficacy on grass courts diminishes, with a mere 26% success rate (11/31). In contrast, Imamura excels on indoor hard courts, showcasing a remarkable win percentage of 67% (6/9). However, their performance falters on clay courts, with a 50% win rate (6/6).
  6. Player Level: During the past year, Clarke has primarily participated in tournaments with a $10K level, such as Futures, Satellites, and ITF, triumphing in an outstanding 73.21% of matches (41/15). Imamura, similarly, has faced formidable opponents in these tournaments, emerging triumphant in an impressive 70.31% of matches (45/19). It is important to note that when comparing players' statistics to predict favorites, such assessments are contingent on the tournament level they have been competing in.
  7. Head-to-Head Encounters: Clarke and Imamura have clashed on one previous occasion. In this encounter, Clarke emerged victorious, seizing the win while Imamura endured defeat. The duration of their sets totaled two, favoring Clarke, who conquered both sets. The last faceoff between Clarke and Imamura transpired at the New Delhi Challenger on 11-02-2025, on hard courts, with Clarke prevailing with an impressive 6-1, 6-4 triumph.
  8. Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: When reflecting on their past head-to-head matches, the average duration between these competitors has settled at 1 hour, 14 minutes, and 13 seconds.
  9. Predicting Deciding Sets: Throughout their encounters, Clarke and Imamura have engaged in zero deciding sets. Consequently, neither player has clinched victory in such situations. This information significantly aids in predicting the outcome if the match were to extend its course.
  10. Head-to-Head Under Extreme Pressure: Notably, Clarke and Imamura have yet to reach any tiebreak situations in their head-to-head matches. None have been won by Clarke, nor by Imamura.
  11. Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past 12 months, Clarke has confronted opponents with an average ranking of 399.16, demonstrating their ability to contend against formidable rivals. Imamura, too, has showcased resilience by competing against players with an average ranking of 431.91.
  12. Deciding Set Performance Across Matches: In those instances where matches were pushed to a deciding set, Clarke has emerged victorious in 46% of these encounters within the last 12 months. Imamura, on the other hand, has demonstrated a slightly higher success rate, triumphing in 54% of deciding sets in all matches played on the tour. These statistics provide invaluable insight for live predictions and betting enthusiasts.
  13. Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: Although past performance serves as a valuable asset for predicting tennis matches, the ongoing events demand a thorough evaluation of current statistics. Such analysis becomes instrumental in gauging the prowess and form of players. For specific insights on the current event, please refer to the section below. Additionally, it is crucial to acknowledge that certain players may exhibit exceptional performances at particular events, ultimately influencing their outcome.
  14. Break Point Conversion: In recent times, Clarke has capitalized on 46.04% of breakpoint opportunities. Imamura has also showcased proficiency in converting these chances, successfully seizing 40.75% of their opponents' service games. Such statistics prove influential when considering in-game live betting tips during critical breakpoint situations.
  15. If you possess an avid interest in models dedicated to predicting tennis matches, peruse this article. Warning: This article is tailored for statistics enthusiasts.

Jay Clarke vs Masamichi Imamura Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Clarke vs M. Imamura H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won1
2Sets Won2
20Games Won18
12Aces (Total)6
7Total Double Faults4
1:25:27Average Match Time1:25:27
56% (59/105)1st Serve %61% (76/124)
71% (42/59)1st Serve Win %68% (52/76)
52% (24/46)2nd Serve Win %46% (22/48)
55% (6/11)Break Pts Won %56% (5/9)
40% (50/124)Return Points Win %37% (39/105)
50% (1/2)Best‑of‑3 Win %50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Clarke 50%, Imamura 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Clarke 55%, Imamura 50%.
Break Points Saved %: Clarke 58%, Imamura 54%.

J. Clarke Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardIslamabad Challenger - 24-11-2025

SF

GBRZ. Stephens
W
7-5 6-3

QF

UKRV. Ursu
W
6-3 4-6 7-6(6)

R2

BULD. Dinev
W
6-2 6-7(1) 6-2
HardSoma Bay Challenger - 17-11-2025

F

GBRT. Samuel
L
4-6 7-6(4) 6-0

SF

FRAM. Erhard
W
6-1 6-3

M. Imamura Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardPlayford Challenger - 24-11-2025

R1

AUSJ. Duckworth
L
6-3 6-2

Q3

DENC. Emil
L
6-4 5-7 6-1

Q1

AUSE. Cook
W
6-4 1-6 6-2
HardYokohama Challenger - 17-11-2025

R1

AUSA. Santillan
L
6-0 6-2
I.hardKobe Challenger - 10-11-2025

Q1

GBRM. Basing
L
4-6 6-3 7-6(5)
banner

J. Clarke vs M. Imamura Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
58.88% (358/250)YTD Win/Loss57.19% (167/125)
56.70% (795/607)Sets Win/Loss56.81% (371/282)
52.68% (6947/6240)Games Win/Loss53.05% (3227/2856)
60.79% (138/89)Hard Win/Loss57.74% (153/112)
67.45% (172/83)Clay Win/Loss42.86% (6/8)
46.84% (37/42)Indoor Hard W/L61.54% (8/5)
23.40% (11/36)Grass Win/Loss0% (0/0)
0.28Aces Per Game0.15
1804Aces Total453
0.21Double Faults Per Game0.11
1371Total Double Faults327
1:38:46Average Match Time1:11:4
486.5Average Opponent Rank455.3
58% (23229/39927)1st Serve %65% (9188/14069)
68% (15831/23229)1st Serve Win %65% (6008/9188)
51% (8530/16698)2nd Serve Win %50% (2423/4881)
44% (1903/4281)Break Points Won % (Total)45% (683/1527)
41% (16634/40247)Return Points Win %41% (6018/14502)
24.00% (6/19)Slam W/L0% (0/0)
33.33% (1/2)Masters W/L0% (0/0)
26.32% (5/14)Main Tour W/L0% (0/0)
50.35% (144/142)Challenger W/L40.91% (27/39)
73.45% (202/73)Futures W/L61.95% (140/86)
60% (351/588)Best of 3 Sets Win %57% (166/290)
23% (3/13)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/1)
51% (93/181)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)53% (31/59)
57% (101/177)Deciding Set Win %46% (32/69)
87% (357/309)1st Set Won, Won Match89% (172/153)
13% (357/47)1st Set Won, Lost Match11% (172/19)
19% (251/48)1st Set Lost, Won Match12% (120/14)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Sun, 30 Nov, 10:30 AM
Prediction
BLRE. Arutiunian1
SRBO. Milic3
W1
1.82
W2
1.86
Sun, 30 Nov, 06:00 PM
Prediction
ARGF. A. Gomez
ARGL. Midon7
W1
1.44
W2
2.55
Sun, 30 Nov, 12:00 PM
Prediction
FRAT. Faurel1
MARK. Bennani7
W1
1.69
W2
2.02
Sun, 30 Nov, 10:00 PM
Prediction
COLJ. S. Gomezq
COLN. Mejia2
W1
4.45
W2
1.159
Sun, 30 Nov, 05:30 PM
Prediction
BRAJ. V. S. D. Lago8
ARGT. Farjat2
W1
4.05
W2
1.19
Sun, 30 Nov, 02:00 PM
Prediction
GBRA. Fery1
BELM. Geerts
W1
1.22
W2
3.74